by Mike Banks Valentine
http://SearchEngineOptimism.com/SEO_Tutorial/
A client recently contacted me pointing out that their linking campaign
was starting to pay off handsomely by gaining links at a nearly
astounding rate of about 200 a week! He asked how he could be certain
that those sites that linked to his were spidered and indexed by
the search engines, thereby increasing his PageRank at Google.
Those of you who'd like a primer on PageRank can visit the
following URL's to learn more.
http://www.searchengineoptimism.com/SEO_Tutorial/google_ranking_tips.html
http://www.google.com/technology/
The basic premise of PageRank has it that pages linked to
by other sites, (especially other highly ranked sites) are more
valuable than those with fewer inbound links. Thus, those that have
more inbound links from other highly ranked sites are given higher
placement in the results pages of any search done for pages with
the same keyword phrases. Any search engine marketing specialist
worth their salt will suggest a linking campaign to their clients
as a basic element in improving their search engine positions.
Now returning to my client's question about getting his inbound
links from those sites that had added links to his site, he asked
me if he should simply catalog those sites that linked to him and
then go submit that long list of URL's to the search engines. I
did some research and found that there were nearly 6000 inbound
links, but that only a fragment of those were now cataloged by Google
and applied to his PageRank
With further research, I found that dozens of those links came from
his articles distributed across the web that had links to his site
within his resource box at the end of the articles. Further, many
of those sites featured many of his articles and would have required
him to spend hours submitting each of them to every search engine.
I am opposed to the practice of submitting other sites without permission
as well, so this was something I recommended that he NOT do. Submitting
other sites at the same time that they submit themselves could get
them penalized for spamming and that hurts, not helps, your chances
of getting that inbound link crawled and linked back to you.
You'd simply link to those sites that link to your articles in most
cases. If your articles are in their article directory, that directory
will link to your article. There is no need to directly link to
each of your own articles when that involves repeating the same
site over and over.
My comments to my client follow:
Here's an example of my thoughts on this when a site carries multiple
articles.
http://www.webmasterzine.com/newsletters/
"This one URL links to 14 of your articles. Not only does it link
all your articles, but it ranks you higher than if you were to link
to each page individually because your name's on the page 15 times
along with your article titles, which presumably would contain valuable
keywords surrounding your name along with the links to the articles
and their titles. The descriptions presumably include important
keywords too. This can be done for each site that carries multiple
articles. Those are more important to link to than any single articles
listed on small sites that pick up a single article anyway.
I recommend linking instead to the article directories which will
then link to all articles that are then published on each site,
both now and in the future -- whether or not you have multiple articles
listed at this site now."
Top Search Engine Marketers know how important a sitemap can be
for the proper indexing and ranking of all the pages on client sites.
Having a single page that links to all others within the multiple
directories comprising each section can be critical to getting every
page spidered and included in crawler-based search engines.
So I suggested that we create a map of inbound links to his site
and that we link from his home page, to his sitemap and from his
sitemap to the map of inbound linkers. Then submit his map of inbound
links page to the search engines. That gets each of the inbound
linking sites spidered and those inbound links will in turn be credited
to his PageRank#&0153;.
Don't list dead links on this links page! Even though many pages
are listed in the search engines, it doesn't mean that they still
exist and you should either manually check each one if there are
only a few, use link checking software to check them otherwise.
Click below and take a look at the page and note to visitors: http://www.ecommercebase.com/printTemplate.php?aid=441
Something important to consider when someone pulls an article and
the link goes bad. Check every link you include on your map of inbound
links pages.
Another consideration is your resource box when distributing articles
for publication online, it should include a full link, including
the http:// so that it automatically hyperlinks in many content
management programs without having to encode URL's in the HTML by
hand. It's done for editors by the software when it sees the http://
where as if you type www.yoursite.com, your www won't get hyperlinked
automatically by the software.
It behooves you to point out to editors and publishers that you
require your URL to be hyperlinked when articles are used online.
Failure to insist on this practice reduces your PageRank
An alternative practice would be simply to include the HTML in the
text of your resource box and note that it is included when sending
out your article.
Many sites don't distribute articles for use online, so the way
to gain inbound links is simply to provide great content which encourages
linking just because your site offers such valuable information.
This in itself is not enough though, you will gain many more links
if you make it simple for others to link to you. Create a specific
page on your site with HTML code for linking and suggested site
description including relevant keywords that can be cut-and-paste
simple for the less technically savvy.
Here are instructions for those unfamiliar with how to set up a
"link to us" page:
http://searchengineoptimism.com/SEO_Tutorial/link-to-us-pages.html
How do you know who links to you now? Visit Google and type the
following syntax into the search box without the quotemarks "link:www.yoursitename.com"
and press the Google search button. The results page will return
10 results as usual, but look at the blue bar across the top of
the page where it says,
"Searched for pages linking to yoursitename.com. Results 1 - 10
of about 203. Search took 0.16 seconds."
Go through the results pages and you'll quickly discover that many
of those links are repeats for one reason or other. This doesn't
necessarily mean that 203 linking results reflect that many sites,
just that many links. Google also eliminates many duplicate site
listings in the results pages, as you'll be able to see when you've
reached the last page of results when reviewing all of your site
links. Google will show only a few of the results, then note after
a few pages:
"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted
some entries very similar to the 37 already displayed. If you like,
you can repeat the search with omitted results included."
The results on the above search don't mean you've found all the
sites that link to you either. If you distribute articles for use
online, post to forums using a signature line or even take part
in discussion lists archived online, you will find many more links
to your site by searching for your own name or any "handle" or "screen
name" you regularly use.
Go to Google again and type in your screen name or any other often-used
moniker that identifies you and enclose it within quote marks in
the Google search box and click the search button. Using your own
name, this is called an "EGO" search.
http://tinyurl.com/7vg3
As a writer that has distributed articles across the web for over
four years, I do this to find where those pieces have been published
and make certain that the site has adhered to guide- lines I've
established for use of my articles. Searching for my own name returns
over 1000 results and, to my surprise, many of those results also
link to my site, but are not listed when doing the previous search
using "link:www.website101.com"
In order to gain additional scoring PageRank at Google, I
have set up a map page like that I've been describing here for one
of my web sites at the following address to assure that it gets
all inbound links spidered and credited to my web site links and
hopefully improves Website101 PageRank at Google, which is
currently at 7 out of a possible 10.
http://www.website101.com/website101links.html
You'll note when you visit that page that I've placed the links
in no particular order except the first one, which I've always been
very proud of - since the day we earned that honor in 1999. Entrepreneur
Magazine linked to WebSite101 and helped raise our visibility dramatically.
Another early linker was Internet.com, where we have gained steady
streams of traffic due to perceived importance of such a referring
site.
There are dozens of additional methods of getting your site linked
by other sites which is discussed more fully at the following URL:
http://searchengineoptimism.com/SEO_Tutorial/link_popularity.html
Use those techniques wisely, then keep track of who links to you
and create your inbound links map to tell search engines how popular
your site is and you'll see your PageRank increase over time.
Concentrate on those sites likely to link to you at first, but don't
hesitate to request links from the big boys either.
That highly coveted link from Entrepreneur Magazine mentioned above
came from online distribution of a press release done in October
of 1999 and got WebSite101 linked from Entrepreneur Magazine online
as well as a blurb in the December 1999 print edition of Entrepreneur.
All of this work may seem mundane and tedious, but the results of
that tedium can mean huge boosts to visibility, traffic to your
site and profit in your bank account.
A final note of caution - Don't link to just anyone who asks you
to! Many unscrupulous webmasters will post your link only long enough
for you to see it and then take it down or bury it in massive link
farms created solely for their own benefit.
Another site that links to WebSite101 is SiteTipsandTricks.com where
Bob McElwain has written a highly recommended article on link swapping
scams.
Take a look at Bob's article:
http://searchengineoptimism.com/SEO_Tutorial/link_swap_scam.html
Take heed of all those requests to link to unknown sites that use
software generated "Personalized" letters to webmasters seeking
links to www.some-stupid-site.com/unrelated-content/ I've seen dozens
of these notes claiming that the site owner "found you in Yahoo,
my favorite search engine" (sic) and "I'm sure you are aware of
the value of reciprocal links" and "I've already linked to you"
and when you visit, you find hundreds of irrelevant, pointless links
to unrelated content.
I'd be remiss if I didn't remind you that use of this article requires
that links in the resource box be made live by hyperlinking ;-)
Keep on with your links campaign and then tell them you learned
best techniques at SearchEngineOptimism by linking to us! We only
link to those we find with links to us done in searches at Google,
or those who provide articles on relevant subjects that would benefit
visitors to our site.
|
WEBSITE101 TUTORIALS
HTML Tutorial
| CGI
tutorial | Email
Tutorial | Spam
Tutorial | Cookies
Tutorial | Privacy
Tutorial | Windows
Tutorial | DreamWeaver
Tutorial | Domain
Name Tutorial | Business
Plan Tutorial | Search
Position Tutorial | Online
Advertising Tutorial | Ecommerce
Essentials Tutorial
|