- Image via Wikipedia
It has been nearly a week since this story reached the public discourse. It is the story of Monica Gaudio – an author scorned — and Judith Griggs, the smug and arrogant editor of the Cooks Source Magazine, based in New England.
Most copyright infringement stories never see the light of day, but this one was very different.
There were actually several factors that enabled this particular copyright infringement story to get wings and fly around the world within hours, most notably the editors’ response to the author:
- Monica did not say, “You have wronged me, so send me money.” Instead, she said in essence, “You wronged me. Apologize in public and send a check to the Columbia School of Journalism.”?? She asked for the payment to go to charity.
The Cooks Source Magazine editor made several suggestions in her defense that literally angered everyone who has read her response:
- After opening her response with the suggestion that it may have been a mistake, because the staff was tired and bleary-eyed, she went on to make statements that seemed to indicate a justification of the action;
- Editor Judith Griggs claimed that everything on the Internet was “public domain”;
- Additionally, it was said they could have just used the work and not attributed it to the author;
- After all, this “happens all the time” in universities and the workplace;
- She suggested that in removing the Old English from the original text, she had in fact improved the article to the point where the author could now use the article in her “writing portfolio”.
- The editors’ version of an apology was, “My bad!!”
- And perhaps the bit that got most people riled was the suggestion that the author should compensate the editor for the rewrites!
Am I taking Judith Griggs’ words out of context? You be the judge:
Yes Monica, I have been doing this for 3 decades, having been an editor at The Voice, Housitonic Home and Connecticut Woman Magazine. I do know about copyright laws. It was “my bad” indeed, and, as the magazine is put together in long sessions, tired eyes and minds somethings forget to do these things.
But honestly Monica, the web is considered “public domain” and you should be happy we just didn’t “lift” your whole article and put someone else’s name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace.
If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio.
For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me!
I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me. ALWAYS for free!
Notice: Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
This is the email that has been read around the world!!
And it just oozes with smugness and arrogance. And it really tees off the people who read it.
Perhaps one of the best YouTube Video responses to this copyright infringement controversy is the one that is presented here.
More detailed version of this story can be found here:
- Detailed Insight into the Cooks Source Magazine PR Debacle; and
- How Publishing Really Works story, “Copyright Infringement And A Medieval Apple Pie“
Today will be day 6 in the Cooks Source controversy, and to date, no one has been able to reach Judith Griggs (Owner/Publisher of Cooks Source Magazine) for comment. Her phones and email are going unanswered.
The only response the world has from Judith Griggs is the post that was made on her Facebook page:
Well, here I am with egg on my face! I did apologise to Monica via email, but aparently it wasnt enough for her. To all of you, thank you for your interest in Cooks Source and Again, to Monica, I am sorry – my bad!
You did find a way to get your “pound of flesh…” we used to have 110 “friends,” we now have 1,870… wow!
Notice: Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
As of right now, Cooks Source Magazine still has 5,762 “friends” on its Facebook page. (Notice: If you go to the Facebook page, be aware that the comments are not friendly and certainly not family-friendly. If you are easily offended, do not click the link.)
The Tip Of The Iceberg
They say that the part of the iceberg that you can see is just a portion of what is actually there. It is suggested that as much as 90% to 95% of the iceberg is hidden beneath the waves.
And so it was with this story.
As a certain point, someone realized that if Cooks Source would publish content by one author, without notification or payment, then perhaps the magazine had done it before. So people began to review previously published materials to see if there were any other potential cases of copyright infringement by Judith Griggs and Cooks Source Magazine.
People began to investigate the possibility of additional copyright infringement cases.
There are three web pages where this information is being tracked and confirmed:
- The investigation was started in earnest here;
- Realizing that the previous page could be deleted at any moment, the information was recompiled here. There are currently 160 cases of “possible” copyright theft — including articles and images;
- In Edward Champion’s blog, he has been contacting the rightful copyright owners of the potential theft of their materials. Currently, he has verified 6 cases of copyright theft by Cooks Source Magazine.
The Legal Fallout Is Yet To Come
In the Time Magazine news story, it has been confirmed that Paula Deen of The Food Network has sent the potential copyright infringement of her articles to The Food Network’s legal department.
NPR has also confirmed that one of its stories was included in Cooks Source Magazine. While the story did not specify what actions NPR may take, they did verify in the story the fact that one of their articles had been used.
Other potential thefts from major media companies include content created by: Disney, WebMD, Weight Watchers, Food TV, Martha Stewart, Whole Living, Recipes?? Today, Natural News, and Sunset.com.
Monica Gaudio has also verified that she has secured an attorney to help her in her case. Gaudio’s attorney may be joining a Who’s Who of media giants in the legal actions that will drive Cooks Source Magazine into bankruptcy. How is that for “a pound of flesh“?
Recipe For Mud Pie, Flavored With a Touch of Smug and Arrogant Retort
[schema type=”recipe” name=”Mud Pie for Authors” author=”Bill Platt” pubdate=”2010-11-09″ image=”https://website101.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Cold-Brew-Coffee-Dilution-Sweetening.jpg” prepmins=”20″ cookhours=”1″ yield=”12″ calories=”2000″ fatcount=”0″ sugarcount=”2″ saltcount=”.5″ ingrt_1=”Cooks Source Magazine” ingrt_2=”1 lb. Mud” ingrt_3=”2 – Standard Pie Crusts” ingrt_4=”2 teaspoons of Powdered Sugar” ingrt_5=”2 cups of wine” instructions=”Shred the Table of Contents and the About The Publisher pages of the Cooks Source Magazine. Don’t forget to include the page that includes the Cooks Source copyright notice.
Take the shredded documents, before the media giant attorneys arrive, and add the mud to it slowly, continuing to stir as you mix. If the mud starts to thicken making it difficult to stir, add in some of the wine to moisten the mixture. Continue adding the mud, from the local cattle yard, until you have filled the bowl and mixed the shredded documents consistently throughout the ingredients. Stir in what remains of the wine, to give it a soft-paste like texture. Pour your mixture into each of the pie crusts equally” ]
(Notice: You may reprint this recipe online, so long as you link back to this page when you do so.)
The Cooks Source Controversy Has No Expiration Date
Cooks Source has been called in jest: Crook’s Source, Crock’s Source and Kook’s Source.
It has gained its own Wikipedia page and Meme page. Another website has been set up at Crooks Source.com to keep tabs on the story as it develops further.
This controversy has even added new words to the English lexicon:
grigg – verb: (source)
1. To use content on the web without permission, then request payment from original author for rewrites and editing.
2. To remain ignorant of plagiarism, ethics, copyright, and asshat behavior.crooksource – verb:
It is like outsourcing, but you do not pay for the content you use. And if caught, you claim that you have a legal right to steal the content.
With the coming copyright infringement lawsuits, we are certain to continue to see Cooks Source in the news for a long time.
And given the fallout with a “professional editor” thinking that the Internet is “public domain”, educators are sure to be talking about this case for many years to come.
About The Author:
Bill Platt provided ghost writing services from 2001-2009, and he has provided article syndication since 2001 at his website
In 2010, Bill produced a comprehensive Traffic Generation Strategies Guide that reviewers are widely praising for its quality and detail. One reviewer summed it up as, “Comprehensive!!” This inexpensive traffic generation guide is an absolute must for any online business owner. Pick up a copy for your marketing library.
.
Related articles
- Copyright scandal cooks up online frontier justice (theglobeandmail.com)
- Are Cooks Source Magazine and Judith Griggs innocent? (psychologytoday.com)
- The Cooks Source Case: Public Domain vs. Public Domain (plagiarismtoday.com)
- Cooking Up A Copyright Storm (jeremynicholl.com)
- Cooks Source Copyright Infringement Becomes an Internet Meme (wired.com)
- Lift a Blogger’s Post? But Honestly, Cook’s Source, You Can’t Do That (blogher.com)
- Cooks Source Editor Finally Responds… Makes Things Worse [Updated] (techdirt.com)
